[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ theme_builder_area=”post_content” _builder_version=”4.24.2″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.24.2″ _module_preset=”default” theme_builder_area=”post_content” width=”100%” custom_padding=”0px||0px||true|false” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″][et_pb_column _builder_version=”4.24.2″ _module_preset=”default” type=”4_4″ theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.24.2″ _module_preset=”default” theme_builder_area=”post_content” text_font_size=”1.2em” text_line_height=”1.5em” text_orientation=”justified” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″]Law 2300 of 2023 has been sued for allegedly violating constitutional principles. Specifically, the Constitutional Court is examining the allegation related to the legislative process of the law, as this regulation governs the fundamental rights to privacy and tranquility. However, the statutory law procedure was not followed, thus breaching the legal reservation. Currently, the Constitutional Court is reviewing the technical concepts it received until February 2, 2024, which will serve as the basis for its decision-making.[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Specifically, the Constitutional Court is examining the allegation related to the legislative process of the law.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":4403977,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[59,156],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4403976","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-newsletter-en","category-data-privacy"],"yoast_head":"\n